Jennifer Lopez is combating to keep exclusive video footage this lady once had with her first partner, Ojani Noa, from viewing the light of day. The video — which consists of 27 hours of video footage — allegedly includes sex situations through the pair’s vacation back in 97. Noa attempted to sell the tape, containing sparked the best battle with the balmy singer.
But the 41-year-old singer was able to get a court docket order barring Noa from releasing the tape, at least for a day. On Monday, Irvine County Superior Courtroom Judge Wayne Chalfant ruled in her favor and issued a temporary restraining buy stopping the distribution from the film. However , the judge declined to halt media retailers from broadcasting the racy footage if they affect get their hands on that.
Noa’s lawyer, Drew Meyer, is usually arguing that his customer didn’t disobey any confidentiality agreements with Lopez if he started shopping the task around. He claims that the footage is not only a sex cassette and says he’s just making a mockumentary about the couple’s tumultuous romance.
Even though Noa was unable to relieve the movie, this individual still wants to do so. This individual reportedly believes that the cassette is safe to release given that Lopez features withdrawn her claim against him even though the case was at arbitration. In respect to Connected magazine, the master tape within the footage happens to be in a central depository but Meyer feels that they have uncovered a legal loophole and will be allowed to release that soon.
J Lo’s ex-husband had been caught with his hand in the cookie container once ahead of, and the “I Can’t Imagine It” performer isn’t choosing any chances this time around. She recently sued Noa pertaining to $10 mil claiming that he breached a privacy agreement when he attempted to sell the home video https://married-dating.org/wannahookup-review/ video footage from their marital life, which simply lasted 10 months.
Noa has already filed his own legal action against the hot star, making claims that the lady wrongfully dismissed him coming from her Pasadena restaurant 5 years ago. He likewise attemptedto write a tell-all about their relationship and was blocked by Lopez’s attorneys. In that earlier round of litigation, Noa was purchased to give the singer a settlement and agreed not to demonstrate for monetary gain any personal details about their relationship.